To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
0 Responses
If there’s already a decent Aerosoft version of Corfu why are FlyTampa wasting their time on another version? I won’t be buying it despite being a FT fan. With so many other airports in need of improvement this seems like a waste of effort. Milan Malpensa needs professional attention. Why not do that instead?
decent Corfu vs. FT Corfu…an easy choice for me 🙂
is like saying FS9 is a decent sim, why buy FSX or P3D..
It’s a small single runway airport with no jetways. What are you expecting FT to create? Lipstick on a pig is still a pig. If you haven’t bought the Aerosoft version then fine, buy it. But I can’t see many who have buying a duplicate airport.
Corfu as it should be! Full coverage i expect, like St.Maarten?
btw what is this nonsense about a single runway and no jetways? if that’s all you can understand from a scenery then you have wasted a lot pf money. Just use default my friend, i doubt you will realise the difference.
The “single runway and no jetways” is no nonsense but simply illustrating the fact, that a smaller airport does not offer so many things to make a new FT version superior to the current AS version (from the same designer…). Simply: redoing a bigger airport offers plenty of things to be improved, a “single runway no jetway airport” offers only little. This is completely independent of the quality of the final product…
Acording to flusinews.de Corfu will be developped by Emilios Gemenetzidis (FlyTampa) – the same developer who produced this under the Label of LIVEinFSX for Aerosoft – Aerosoft was only the publisher