To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
0 Responses
Ugghhhh 🙁 , of all the Aircraft to model, they picked that Ugly Duckling ???
would rather of em’ spent time Developing the Dehavilland DHC-3 Twin Otter/ Wheeled & Float versions .
Even better a Real True Grumman Goose Float Plane !
How bout’ a True Carenado Howard 500 Radial Aircraft Propliner 🙂 !
but that thing pictured above ? Really ??? Ughhh 🙁
Personally I disagree with you. In all its ugliness I find this model quite beautiful. In fact, if I could make a request for the next model it would be another even uglier aircraft – the Shorts Skyvan. Instead of yet another Twin Otter. I do agree with you about the Goose and the Howard, though,