To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
We already reported here that Copenhaguen Kastrup EKCH airport was one of the current project to be branded and published by FlyTampa, but it was a good while ago.
0 Responses
When does it release?
There is already a version of EKCH for FSX so I’m not sure why another has been done when there are so many other airports that are needed. Malaga is Spain’s 3rd busiest airport but has been ignored by developers. I don’t understand why.
As an X-plane user these days, my choice of detailed airports is limited, no matter what. But in my MS FS days, I was often frustrated that none of the major 3d party developers seemed interested in doing Long Island McArthur Airport, or Bridgeport Sikorsky Memorial airport; two airports that have a special meaning to me.
Either they expect it won’t sell (enough); or maybe they can’t get hold of the required information. Just guessing.
There is another version of EKCH? (scansim). Really? If you are happy with that, they why bother buying an add-on in the first place, just go default mate.