To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
0 Responses
This shouldn´t be posted here. This company made a big problem with a designer from France, who created a marvelous Rafale. They didn´t allow him to use their name and he had to withdraw the Rafale from the market. Now it is impossible to get it for FSX.
I think it should 🙂 Anyway, I agree with you about the rest and we wrote about it here. There are even more to say about Dassault owner, but THAT should NOT be posted here 🙂
The fact that he is developing an FS add-on doesn’t remove the developer’s requirement to obey the law, Thilo.
I take it from your comment that you don’t remember the mess a few years ago when members of the oneWorld Alliance (particularly American Airlines) attempted to wrest control of all repaints using their colours in the FS community? If not, you might like to do some research on it – removing one product from the market is getting off lightly the moment lawyers feel the copyright/trademarks they are paid to protect are being infringed!
I’m told, but don’t have first hand experience of it, that the model railway/railroad industry get far more pressure from real world companies and manufacturers to protect trademarks and copyrighted liveries/insignia than we get in the FS world.
I remember. I don’t know if it was around Fs2002 or FS2004 but I still shudder at the sight of an FS virtual world forcefully filled only with Orbit, Pacifica, Landmark, Watermark or Whatever Airlines…